dc.contributor.author | Tebes, Guido Sebastián | |
dc.contributor.author | Peppino, Denis Hernán | |
dc.contributor.author | Becker, Pablo Javier | |
dc.contributor.author | Papa, María Fernanda | |
dc.contributor.author | Rivera, María Belén | |
dc.contributor.author | Olsina Santos, Luis Antonio | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-09T13:34:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-09T13:34:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-04-25 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repo.unlpam.edu.ar/handle/unlpam/7816 | |
dc.description.abstract | Companies commonly establish and pursue business goals. A goal states a purpose. In the Software Engineering literature, different evaluation purposes such as to understand, monitor, improve, control, compare and select are mentioned. Considering that these purposes share distinctive and common aspects, in the present work, we include a categorization that helps a better understanding of them. On the other hand, to reach the purpose of a goal, a suitable strategy should be chosen. A strategy describes a particular course of action by means of process and method specifications. We have envisioned different strategies for different evaluation goal purposes. Therefore, in this paper we also present some strategies, which are part of a family of strategies driven by measurement and evaluation activities. Specifically, we document evaluation strategies for the monitoring, improving, and comparing and adopting purposes. In addition, we illustrate the comparing and adopting strategy applied to four social network mobile apps. | es_AR |
dc.description.uri | https://journal.info.unlp.edu.ar/JCST/article/view/694/224 | es_AR |
dc.format.medium | application/pdf | es_AR |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_AR |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) | es_AR |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | es_AR |
dc.source | Journal of Computer Science & Technology. 2018; 18 (1), 48-60. | es_AR |
dc.source.uri | https://journal.info.unlp.edu.ar/JCST/issue/view/21 | es_AR |
dc.title | Family of Evaluation Strategies: a practical case for comparing and adopting Strengths | es_AR |
dc.type | artículo | es_AR |
dc.unlpam.doi | https://doi.org/10.24215/16666038.18.e06 | es_AR |
dc.unlpam.instituciondeorigen | Facultad de Ingeniería | es_AR |
dc.unlpam.access | openAccess | es_AR |
dc.unlpam.version | publishedVersion | es_AR |
dc.unlpam.filiacion | Tebes, Guido Sebastián. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ingeniería. GIDIS_Web. General Pico, Argentina. | es_AR |
dc.unlpam.filiacion | Peppino, Denis Hernán. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ingeniería. GIDIS_Web. General Pico, Argentina. | es_AR |
dc.unlpam.filiacion | Becker, Pablo Javier. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ingeniería. GIDIS_Web. General Pico, Argentina. | es_AR |
dc.unlpam.filiacion | Papa, María Fernanda. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ingeniería. GIDIS_Web. General Pico, Argentina. | es_AR |
dc.unlpam.filiacion | Rivera, María Belén. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ingeniería. GIDIS_Web. General Pico, Argentina. | es_AR |
dc.unlpam.filiacion | Olsina Santos, Luis Antonio. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ingeniería. GIDIS_Web. General Pico, Argentina. | es_AR |
dc.subject.keyword | Goal | es_AR |
dc.subject.keyword | evaluation purpose | es_AR |
dc.subject.keyword | compare and adopt | es_AR |
dc.subject.keyword | strategy | es_AR |